<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 732 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251706</link>
    <description>The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision to treat the entire advertisement and marketing expenses as revenue expenditure, rejecting the notion of deferred revenue expenditure. The judgment emphasized the importance of advertisement expenses for brand building and business competitiveness, ultimately dismissing the appeal and penalty proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2015 17:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365772" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 732 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251706</link>
      <description>The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision to treat the entire advertisement and marketing expenses as revenue expenditure, rejecting the notion of deferred revenue expenditure. The judgment emphasized the importance of advertisement expenses for brand building and business competitiveness, ultimately dismissing the appeal and penalty proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251706</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>