<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 725 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251699</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the CIT(A) and the Tribunal, dismissing the appeal. It ruled that the entire amount from maintenance contracts could not be taxed in one year due to future obligations and matching principles. The addition under Section 68 was deemed unwarranted as the income source was genuine. The court affirmed the deferred income allocation over subsequent years based on proper calculations and appreciation of facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 May 2015 11:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365764" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 725 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251699</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the CIT(A) and the Tribunal, dismissing the appeal. It ruled that the entire amount from maintenance contracts could not be taxed in one year due to future obligations and matching principles. The addition under Section 68 was deemed unwarranted as the income source was genuine. The court affirmed the deferred income allocation over subsequent years based on proper calculations and appreciation of facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251699</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>