<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 724 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251698</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeals by the Revenue, affirming that the respondent-assessee&#039;s manufacturing of air purifiers constituted genuine manufacturing activities under Section 80-IC of the Income Tax Act. The court found that the final product, the air purification system, was a new commodity with distinct characteristics, meeting the definition of &quot;manufacture&quot; under the Act. The respondent provided evidence of the manufacturing process and the unique nature of the product, leading to the rejection of the Revenue&#039;s disallowance of deductions. The court concluded that no substantial question of law arose, upholding the respondent&#039;s eligibility for deductions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 09:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365763" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 724 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251698</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeals by the Revenue, affirming that the respondent-assessee&#039;s manufacturing of air purifiers constituted genuine manufacturing activities under Section 80-IC of the Income Tax Act. The court found that the final product, the air purification system, was a new commodity with distinct characteristics, meeting the definition of &quot;manufacture&quot; under the Act. The respondent provided evidence of the manufacturing process and the unique nature of the product, leading to the rejection of the Revenue&#039;s disallowance of deductions. The court concluded that no substantial question of law arose, upholding the respondent&#039;s eligibility for deductions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251698</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>