<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 1066 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166438</link>
    <description>Transactions structured through procuring agents under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act were treated according to their substance rather than their form. Although the agents bought coco beans in their own names and issued statutory declarations under the last-purchase scheme, the surrounding facts showed that they acted on their own funds, at their own risk, and delivered goods only after transport to the buyer&#039;s stockyard. Splitting the price into cost, freight, expenses and commission did not change the character of the dealings. The arrangement was therefore treated as a purchase by the buyer, and the reimbursed amounts were included in taxable purchase turnover.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2014 11:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365759" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 1066 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166438</link>
      <description>Transactions structured through procuring agents under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act were treated according to their substance rather than their form. Although the agents bought coco beans in their own names and issued statutory declarations under the last-purchase scheme, the surrounding facts showed that they acted on their own funds, at their own risk, and delivered goods only after transport to the buyer&#039;s stockyard. Splitting the price into cost, freight, expenses and commission did not change the character of the dealings. The arrangement was therefore treated as a purchase by the buyer, and the reimbursed amounts were included in taxable purchase turnover.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166438</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>