<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 1014 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166436</link>
    <description>Section 20(2A) of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 bars suo motu revisional power under section 20(1) or 20(2) where the same issue is already subject to appeal before the Appellate Tribunal or has been decided by it. The provision prevents reopening a concluded controversy, and the attempted notice seeking to revisit the branch transfer treatment as inter-State sales was therefore outside revisional jurisdiction. The notice was liable to be quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2015 17:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365757" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 1014 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166436</link>
      <description>Section 20(2A) of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 bars suo motu revisional power under section 20(1) or 20(2) where the same issue is already subject to appeal before the Appellate Tribunal or has been decided by it. The provision prevents reopening a concluded controversy, and the attempted notice seeking to revisit the branch transfer treatment as inter-State sales was therefore outside revisional jurisdiction. The notice was liable to be quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166436</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>