<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 1287 - Madras High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166418</link>
    <description>Under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, a suo motu revision by the Joint Commissioner was challenged as time-barred and beyond jurisdiction. The notice initiating revision was issued within five years of the appellate order sought to be revised, and the statutory prohibition against initiating revision after five years was therefore not triggered. The objection that the revisional order was non est for delay failed, and the revision was treated as within time.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2014 12:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365739" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 1287 - Madras High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166418</link>
      <description>Under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, a suo motu revision by the Joint Commissioner was challenged as time-barred and beyond jurisdiction. The notice initiating revision was issued within five years of the appellate order sought to be revised, and the statutory prohibition against initiating revision after five years was therefore not triggered. The objection that the revisional order was non est for delay failed, and the revision was treated as within time.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166418</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>