https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166416 Challenge to the amended entry 23 of the Third Schedule to the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 and the resulting reassessment on household insecticides was not entertained on merits because the dispute involved mixed questions of fact and law better examined by the statutory appellate forum. The writ court held that the Appellate Tribunal was the appropriate remedy, while granting interim protection against coercive recovery of the balance tax until the Tribunal decided the matter. The Tribunal was directed to dispose of the appeal within three months. en-us Tue, 25 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 25 Sep 2014 12:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166416 Challenge to the amended entry 23 of the Third Schedule to the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 and the resulting reassessment on household insecticides was not entertained on merits because the dispute involved mixed questions of fact and law better examined by the statutory appellate forum. The writ court held that the Appellate Tribunal was the appropriate remedy, while granting interim protection against coercive recovery of the balance tax until the Tribunal decided the matter. The Tribunal was directed to dispose of the appeal within three months. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 25 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166416