<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 1117 - Madras High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166415</link>
    <description>Before the 23.04.1987 amendment to Condition 6 of Form C licence, theatre owners were not required to obtain prior approval from the licensing authority to reduce admission rates, because the regulatory scheme and administrative practice treated only increases as needing permission. The 1987 substitution of &quot;increase&quot; with &quot;alteration&quot; enlarged the licence condition, but the amendment was prospective only, as no retrospective operation was expressed or necessarily implied. It therefore could not be used to sustain reassessment for earlier assessment years. On that basis, the reassessment orders and consequential demand notices were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2014 11:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365736" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 1117 - Madras High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166415</link>
      <description>Before the 23.04.1987 amendment to Condition 6 of Form C licence, theatre owners were not required to obtain prior approval from the licensing authority to reduce admission rates, because the regulatory scheme and administrative practice treated only increases as needing permission. The 1987 substitution of &quot;increase&quot; with &quot;alteration&quot; enlarged the licence condition, but the amendment was prospective only, as no retrospective operation was expressed or necessarily implied. It therefore could not be used to sustain reassessment for earlier assessment years. On that basis, the reassessment orders and consequential demand notices were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166415</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>