<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 721 - Karnataka High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251695</link>
    <description>A 100% export oriented unit was found entitled to refund of excess input tax where the Department had already ed both eligibility and quantum, and withholding the refund only pending audit of the assessment year was held contrary to the Karnataka VAT refund provisions. The Court treated the audit pendency as no valid ground to deny refund on admitted facts, and the endorsement refusing refund was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2014 11:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365735" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 721 - Karnataka High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251695</link>
      <description>A 100% export oriented unit was found entitled to refund of excess input tax where the Department had already ed both eligibility and quantum, and withholding the refund only pending audit of the assessment year was held contrary to the Karnataka VAT refund provisions. The Court treated the audit pendency as no valid ground to deny refund on admitted facts, and the endorsement refusing refund was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251695</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>