<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 703 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251677</link>
    <description>The Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and restored the Assessment Officer&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee. The Court found that the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the transactions were not adequately established, emphasizing the insufficiency of evidence provided by the assessee. The appeal was disposed of with no costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2015 18:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365707" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 703 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251677</link>
      <description>The Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and restored the Assessment Officer&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee. The Court found that the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the transactions were not adequately established, emphasizing the insufficiency of evidence provided by the assessee. The appeal was disposed of with no costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251677</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>