<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Concessional rate under-notification no.43/2001-c.e(n.t)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=107391</link>
    <description>Whether a supplier who receives a Concessional rate certificate under Notification No.43/2001-C.E(N.T) and issues invoices charging nil excise duty must furnish an ARE Form to the customer, and if so which variant (ARE1/ARE2/ARE3), is the operative compliance question; the document records the query and a follow-up request for resolution without a definitive answer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2014 09:06:03 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:57:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365699" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Concessional rate under-notification no.43/2001-c.e(n.t)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=107391</link>
      <description>Whether a supplier who receives a Concessional rate certificate under Notification No.43/2001-C.E(N.T) and issues invoices charging nil excise duty must furnish an ARE Form to the customer, and if so which variant (ARE1/ARE2/ARE3), is the operative compliance question; the document records the query and a follow-up request for resolution without a definitive answer.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2014 09:06:03 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=107391</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>