<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 699 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251673</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the Petition challenging an order disposing of refund applications without a hearing. The Court criticized the authority for not following natural justice principles and emphasized the importance of granting a personal hearing. It noted that time limits for processing claims cannot justify bypassing this requirement. The Court quashed the order, directing a reconsideration of the refund claim with a fair hearing and reasoned decision. The decision did not adjudicate the claim&#039;s merits, leaving them open for future consideration. Petitions were allowed without costs, clarifying that authorities were not obligated to grant the refund solely based on the Court&#039;s directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2017 18:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365686" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 699 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251673</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the Petition challenging an order disposing of refund applications without a hearing. The Court criticized the authority for not following natural justice principles and emphasized the importance of granting a personal hearing. It noted that time limits for processing claims cannot justify bypassing this requirement. The Court quashed the order, directing a reconsideration of the refund claim with a fair hearing and reasoned decision. The decision did not adjudicate the claim&#039;s merits, leaving them open for future consideration. Petitions were allowed without costs, clarifying that authorities were not obligated to grant the refund solely based on the Court&#039;s directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251673</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>