<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 698 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251672</link>
    <description>The Allahabad High Court emphasized the need to avoid granting indefinite waivers of pre-deposit, directing the Tribunal to decide appeals promptly. The Tribunal, citing the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling, clarified its authority to extend stays beyond 365 days due to case backlog. It highlighted that the power to grant stays is inherent in hearing appeals, subject to limitations under Section 35C of the Central Excise Act. Ultimately, the Tribunal extended the waiver of pre-deposit and stay, ensuring it operates during the appeal&#039;s pendency, promoting a balanced approach between appellants&#039; interests and case efficiency.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2014 17:11:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365685" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 698 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251672</link>
      <description>The Allahabad High Court emphasized the need to avoid granting indefinite waivers of pre-deposit, directing the Tribunal to decide appeals promptly. The Tribunal, citing the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling, clarified its authority to extend stays beyond 365 days due to case backlog. It highlighted that the power to grant stays is inherent in hearing appeals, subject to limitations under Section 35C of the Central Excise Act. Ultimately, the Tribunal extended the waiver of pre-deposit and stay, ensuring it operates during the appeal&#039;s pendency, promoting a balanced approach between appellants&#039; interests and case efficiency.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251672</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>