<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 1059 - Madras High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166405</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions challenging appeal orders for tax and penalty, emphasizing the petitioner&#039;s failure to utilize alternative remedies and statutory limitations. The court held that the petitioner&#039;s lack of appearance and failure to appeal to the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal precluded claiming a lack of opportunity. Emphasizing the need to adhere to statutory limitations and pursue effective remedies, the court found the petitioner ineligible to invoke Article 226 relief. Due to delays and failure to establish entitlement to extraordinary remedy, the court dismissed the petitions without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2014 11:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365662" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 1059 - Madras High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166405</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions challenging appeal orders for tax and penalty, emphasizing the petitioner&#039;s failure to utilize alternative remedies and statutory limitations. The court held that the petitioner&#039;s lack of appearance and failure to appeal to the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal precluded claiming a lack of opportunity. Emphasizing the need to adhere to statutory limitations and pursue effective remedies, the court found the petitioner ineligible to invoke Article 226 relief. Due to delays and failure to establish entitlement to extraordinary remedy, the court dismissed the petitions without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166405</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>