<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 879 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166404</link>
    <description>Section 33(1) of the Himachal Pradesh General Sales Tax Act prescribed a 60-day limitation for sales tax revision, and the provision was treated as a complete code on limitation. The general condonation power under section 5 of the Limitation Act was held inapplicable to extend that period. As the revision was filed beyond time, it could not be entertained and was dismissed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2014 11:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365661" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 879 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166404</link>
      <description>Section 33(1) of the Himachal Pradesh General Sales Tax Act prescribed a 60-day limitation for sales tax revision, and the provision was treated as a complete code on limitation. The general condonation power under section 5 of the Limitation Act was held inapplicable to extend that period. As the revision was filed beyond time, it could not be entertained and was dismissed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166404</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>