<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 713 - Madras High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166401</link>
    <description>The High Court Madras ruled in favor of the petitioner, setting aside the penalty and confirming the application of the formula for assessment under section 12(2) of the Act. The Court found discrepancies in the assessing officer&#039;s actions and concluded that the penalty imposition was unjustified as it was based on formula adoption without concrete evidence. The Court allowed the appeal, rejecting the penalty imposition and siding with the assessee against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2014 12:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365658" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 713 - Madras High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166401</link>
      <description>The High Court Madras ruled in favor of the petitioner, setting aside the penalty and confirming the application of the formula for assessment under section 12(2) of the Act. The Court found discrepancies in the assessing officer&#039;s actions and concluded that the penalty imposition was unjustified as it was based on formula adoption without concrete evidence. The Court allowed the appeal, rejecting the penalty imposition and siding with the assessee against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166401</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>