<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 687 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251661</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order confirming the demand for recovery of wrongly availed Cenvat credit by PMS and imposed penalties. The matter was remanded for fresh adjudication, directing the examination of job workers under Section 9D of the Central Excise Act and allowing cross-examination by PMS. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of cross-examination in such proceedings, highlighting procedural lapses in the investigation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2015 10:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365648" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 687 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251661</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order confirming the demand for recovery of wrongly availed Cenvat credit by PMS and imposed penalties. The matter was remanded for fresh adjudication, directing the examination of job workers under Section 9D of the Central Excise Act and allowing cross-examination by PMS. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of cross-examination in such proceedings, highlighting procedural lapses in the investigation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251661</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>