<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 679 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251653</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal concerning the classification of imported goods under the Customs Act, 1962. The dispute centered on whether the equipment imported by the respondent was a live television broadcasting transmitter, requiring a license, or intended for one-to-one communication without the need for a license. The Court sided with the respondent, finding that the equipment&#039;s purpose was limited to transmitting signals to the studio and not for public broadcasting. As a result, the Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing the lack of legal grounds for interference and dismissing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2014 09:30:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365615" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 679 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251653</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal concerning the classification of imported goods under the Customs Act, 1962. The dispute centered on whether the equipment imported by the respondent was a live television broadcasting transmitter, requiring a license, or intended for one-to-one communication without the need for a license. The Court sided with the respondent, finding that the equipment&#039;s purpose was limited to transmitting signals to the studio and not for public broadcasting. As a result, the Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing the lack of legal grounds for interference and dismissing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251653</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>