<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 678 - Bombay High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251652</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in an appeal challenging an order related to smuggling cars by misusing Transfer of Residence Rules. The appellant&#039;s arguments for exoneration and against penalty imposition were rejected, with the Tribunal finding substantial evidence of involvement in the scheme. The Tribunal&#039;s reliance on a co-noticee&#039;s statement was deemed acceptable due to independent corroboration. The Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the penalty imposition and finding no merit in the appellant&#039;s contentions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2014 09:30:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365614" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 678 - Bombay High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251652</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in an appeal challenging an order related to smuggling cars by misusing Transfer of Residence Rules. The appellant&#039;s arguments for exoneration and against penalty imposition were rejected, with the Tribunal finding substantial evidence of involvement in the scheme. The Tribunal&#039;s reliance on a co-noticee&#039;s statement was deemed acceptable due to independent corroboration. The Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the penalty imposition and finding no merit in the appellant&#039;s contentions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251652</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>