<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 666 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251640</link>
    <description>The High Court disposed of the appeal by the Revenue challenging the Customs, Excise &amp;amp; Service Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order granting waiver of duty demand, interest, and penalty, and extending the stay period beyond 365 days. The Court emphasized the need for expeditious disposal of appeals within specific timeframes to prevent indefinite extension of stay orders. It directed the Tribunal to decide the appeal within six months, maintaining the validity of the waiver of pre-deposit for the specified period. The Court&#039;s decision aimed to uphold legislative intent and ensure compliance with statutory provisions, balancing the interests of the parties involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2014 09:11:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365602" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 666 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251640</link>
      <description>The High Court disposed of the appeal by the Revenue challenging the Customs, Excise &amp;amp; Service Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order granting waiver of duty demand, interest, and penalty, and extending the stay period beyond 365 days. The Court emphasized the need for expeditious disposal of appeals within specific timeframes to prevent indefinite extension of stay orders. It directed the Tribunal to decide the appeal within six months, maintaining the validity of the waiver of pre-deposit for the specified period. The Court&#039;s decision aimed to uphold legislative intent and ensure compliance with statutory provisions, balancing the interests of the parties involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251640</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>