<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 663 - CESTAT NEW DELHI (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251637</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that the appellant must deposit Rs. 6,00,000 through PLA within eight weeks for defaulted duty payment, allowing recredit to the Cenvat account. It emphasized Rule 8(3A) compliance, requiring PLA payment during default and imposed a penalty of Rs. 5,000 under Rule 27. The decision aligned with legal provisions and higher court interpretations, limiting the penalty and emphasizing duty payment through PLA during default.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2014 09:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365599" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 663 - CESTAT NEW DELHI (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251637</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that the appellant must deposit Rs. 6,00,000 through PLA within eight weeks for defaulted duty payment, allowing recredit to the Cenvat account. It emphasized Rule 8(3A) compliance, requiring PLA payment during default and imposed a penalty of Rs. 5,000 under Rule 27. The decision aligned with legal provisions and higher court interpretations, limiting the penalty and emphasizing duty payment through PLA during default.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251637</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>