<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 659 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251633</link>
    <description>The Tribunal classified Minute Maid Nimbu Fresh (MMNF) under sub-heading 22021020 as &quot;Lemonade,&quot; subjecting it to duty and interest. The penalty was set aside as the appellants had informed the Assistant Commissioner of their intended classification. MMNF was deemed to fit the description of lemonade under the tariff structure and HSN notes. The appeal was disposed of with MMNF being liable for duty and interest but without any penalty imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2015 18:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365592" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 659 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251633</link>
      <description>The Tribunal classified Minute Maid Nimbu Fresh (MMNF) under sub-heading 22021020 as &quot;Lemonade,&quot; subjecting it to duty and interest. The penalty was set aside as the appellants had informed the Assistant Commissioner of their intended classification. MMNF was deemed to fit the description of lemonade under the tariff structure and HSN notes. The appeal was disposed of with MMNF being liable for duty and interest but without any penalty imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251633</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>