<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 653 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251627</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling that while merging plots to meet the 1-acre requirement was impermissible, the assessee was entitled to the deduction under section 80IB(10) due to the relaxation provided by the notification for projects under the slum rehabilitation scheme. The Tribunal emphasized that additional conditions imposed by the board&#039;s notification, contradicting the statute, could not be upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2014 09:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365586" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 653 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251627</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling that while merging plots to meet the 1-acre requirement was impermissible, the assessee was entitled to the deduction under section 80IB(10) due to the relaxation provided by the notification for projects under the slum rehabilitation scheme. The Tribunal emphasized that additional conditions imposed by the board&#039;s notification, contradicting the statute, could not be upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251627</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>