<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 652 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251626</link>
    <description>The Tribunal reversed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and upheld the addition of Rs. 27,27,479 as income due to bogus purchase expenses. The Tribunal reinstated the penalty of Rs. 11,78,752 under Section 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars, remanding the penalty issue back to the CIT(A) for reconsideration based on other grounds. The case was remanded for further consideration on the penalty matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2014 06:28:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365585" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 652 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251626</link>
      <description>The Tribunal reversed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and upheld the addition of Rs. 27,27,479 as income due to bogus purchase expenses. The Tribunal reinstated the penalty of Rs. 11,78,752 under Section 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars, remanding the penalty issue back to the CIT(A) for reconsideration based on other grounds. The case was remanded for further consideration on the penalty matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251626</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>