<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 1254 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166389</link>
    <description>In revisional jurisdiction, an interim tax recovery order may be modified where a balanced arrangement is needed to protect both the assessee and the revenue pending appeal. The Court found the Tribunal&#039;s partial stay insufficient on the facts, and granted limited further protection by directing deposit of 10% of the disputed demand, keeping the balance in abeyance till disposal of the appeals, and requiring security for the stayed amount. The appellate authority was also directed to decide the appeals expeditiously.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2014 11:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365577" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 1254 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166389</link>
      <description>In revisional jurisdiction, an interim tax recovery order may be modified where a balanced arrangement is needed to protect both the assessee and the revenue pending appeal. The Court found the Tribunal&#039;s partial stay insufficient on the facts, and granted limited further protection by directing deposit of 10% of the disputed demand, keeping the balance in abeyance till disposal of the appeals, and requiring security for the stayed amount. The appellate authority was also directed to decide the appeals expeditiously.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166389</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>