<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 1009 - Karnataka High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166387</link>
    <description>Section 15(2) of the Karnataka Entry Tax Act required the revisional authority to give the assessee a real opportunity of being heard before enhancing, modifying, cancelling, or directing a fresh assessment. After objections were filed, the authority had to fix a personal hearing and could not leave the hearing to depend on a further request from the assessee. An order passed without such hearing and inquiry was contrary to the statute and breached natural justice, so the revisional order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2014 16:47:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365575" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 1009 - Karnataka High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166387</link>
      <description>Section 15(2) of the Karnataka Entry Tax Act required the revisional authority to give the assessee a real opportunity of being heard before enhancing, modifying, cancelling, or directing a fresh assessment. After objections were filed, the authority had to fix a personal hearing and could not leave the hearing to depend on a further request from the assessee. An order passed without such hearing and inquiry was contrary to the statute and breached natural justice, so the revisional order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166387</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>