<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 893 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166383</link>
    <description>The revision petition challenging the penalty imposed under section 76(11) of the Rajasthan Value Added Tax Act, 2003 for contravention of section 76(2)(a) was dismissed. The assessing officer&#039;s penalty was overturned by the Deputy Commissioner (Appeals) and upheld by the Rajasthan Tax Board, citing the absence of the check-post seal as non-mandatory. Relying on precedent, the court found no legal error in the decisions, emphasizing statutory interpretation and adherence to precedents in tax penalty cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2014 12:42:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365571" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 893 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166383</link>
      <description>The revision petition challenging the penalty imposed under section 76(11) of the Rajasthan Value Added Tax Act, 2003 for contravention of section 76(2)(a) was dismissed. The assessing officer&#039;s penalty was overturned by the Deputy Commissioner (Appeals) and upheld by the Rajasthan Tax Board, citing the absence of the check-post seal as non-mandatory. Relying on precedent, the court found no legal error in the decisions, emphasizing statutory interpretation and adherence to precedents in tax penalty cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166383</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>