<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 740 - Karnataka High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166376</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision on the assessment of the sale price of liquor for the assessment years 1997-98 and 1998-99, accepting the taxable turnover declared by the respondent and directing the assessing officer to issue revised demand notices. The Court supported the Tribunal&#039;s findings, emphasizing the valid reasons and physical evaluation of evidence. Additionally, the High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision on the taxable turnover, dismissing the revision petitions filed by the appellants for lacking merit. The Court found no substantial grounds to interfere with the Tribunal&#039;s well-reasoned orders on the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2014 10:37:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365564" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 740 - Karnataka High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166376</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision on the assessment of the sale price of liquor for the assessment years 1997-98 and 1998-99, accepting the taxable turnover declared by the respondent and directing the assessing officer to issue revised demand notices. The Court supported the Tribunal&#039;s findings, emphasizing the valid reasons and physical evaluation of evidence. Additionally, the High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision on the taxable turnover, dismissing the revision petitions filed by the appellants for lacking merit. The Court found no substantial grounds to interfere with the Tribunal&#039;s well-reasoned orders on the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166376</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>