<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 633 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251607</link>
    <description>The HC held that the 2008 amendment to Rule 6(6)(i) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, is retrospective. Consequently, the benefit of non-reversal of Cenvat credit and maintenance of separate inventory applies not only to excisable goods cleared to SEZ units but also to goods cleared to SEZ developers for authorized operations. The court dismissed the appeals filed by Revenue, affirming that the amendment extends the benefit to developers and is not limited to SEZ units alone.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2025 16:02:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365528" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 633 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251607</link>
      <description>The HC held that the 2008 amendment to Rule 6(6)(i) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, is retrospective. Consequently, the benefit of non-reversal of Cenvat credit and maintenance of separate inventory applies not only to excisable goods cleared to SEZ units but also to goods cleared to SEZ developers for authorized operations. The court dismissed the appeals filed by Revenue, affirming that the amendment extends the benefit to developers and is not limited to SEZ units alone.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251607</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>