<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (12) TMI 182 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166373</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court applied a retrospective deeming provision in Mysore Act 1 of 1971 to hold that the deleted words &quot;or police&quot; in Section 60(b) of the Mysore Excise Act, 1965 were treated as if they had always remained in force. Giving full effect to the legal fiction, the Court held that a police charge-sheet remained a valid basis for cognizance of an offence under Section 34. The lower courts erred in ignoring the retrospective restoration, and the Magistrate was competent to take cognizance on the police report.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2014 13:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365509" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (12) TMI 182 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166373</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court applied a retrospective deeming provision in Mysore Act 1 of 1971 to hold that the deleted words &quot;or police&quot; in Section 60(b) of the Mysore Excise Act, 1965 were treated as if they had always remained in force. Giving full effect to the legal fiction, the Court held that a police charge-sheet remained a valid basis for cognizance of an offence under Section 34. The lower courts erred in ignoring the retrospective restoration, and the Magistrate was competent to take cognizance on the police report.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166373</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>