<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 1320 - Karnataka High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166371</link>
    <description>The Division Bench quashed the impugned order under the KVAT Act, directing the assessing officer to recalculate taxable turnover by considering discounts granted. The court upheld that discounts should lower turnover and be factored into tax calculations, criticizing the assessing officer&#039;s failure to do so. The writ petitions were allowed, with instructions for the assessing officer to seek assistance if required and refund any excess amounts collected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2014 11:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365507" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 1320 - Karnataka High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166371</link>
      <description>The Division Bench quashed the impugned order under the KVAT Act, directing the assessing officer to recalculate taxable turnover by considering discounts granted. The court upheld that discounts should lower turnover and be factored into tax calculations, criticizing the assessing officer&#039;s failure to do so. The writ petitions were allowed, with instructions for the assessing officer to seek assistance if required and refund any excess amounts collected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166371</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>