<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 1284 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166370</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed cross appeals of both the Revenue and the assessee for two assessment years, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to add 30% of the purchase cost as reasonable to cover the gains of the appellant. The Tribunal found no merit in the grounds raised by both parties, confirming the rejection of book results and the addition on account of bogus purchases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2014 16:07:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365504" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 1284 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166370</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed cross appeals of both the Revenue and the assessee for two assessment years, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to add 30% of the purchase cost as reasonable to cover the gains of the appellant. The Tribunal found no merit in the grounds raised by both parties, confirming the rejection of book results and the addition on account of bogus purchases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166370</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>