<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 1251 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166366</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the revision filed under section 11 of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 against the Trade Tax Tribunal&#039;s order for the assessment year 2002-03. The Court held that the assessing officer should have accepted the assessee&#039;s books of account despite their unavailability during a survey, as mala fide intentions were not proven. A de novo assessment was ordered based on the accepted books, overturning all previous decisions by lower authorities and the Tribunal. The revision was granted in favor of the petitioner, emphasizing the importance of valid reasons for rejecting account books and the necessity for proper assessment based on accepted records.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2014 17:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365500" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 1251 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166366</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the revision filed under section 11 of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 against the Trade Tax Tribunal&#039;s order for the assessment year 2002-03. The Court held that the assessing officer should have accepted the assessee&#039;s books of account despite their unavailability during a survey, as mala fide intentions were not proven. A de novo assessment was ordered based on the accepted books, overturning all previous decisions by lower authorities and the Tribunal. The revision was granted in favor of the petitioner, emphasizing the importance of valid reasons for rejecting account books and the necessity for proper assessment based on accepted records.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166366</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>