<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 1251 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166366</link>
    <description>Non-production of books of account at the time of survey does not, by itself, justify rejection of the books unless mala fides or other substantive defects are shown. Where the books were later produced and no reasoned basis was recorded for disbelieving them, adverse inference could not be drawn merely from the survey circumstances. The rejection of the books was therefore unsustainable, and the assessee was entitled to acceptance of the books and a de novo assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2014 17:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365500" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 1251 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166366</link>
      <description>Non-production of books of account at the time of survey does not, by itself, justify rejection of the books unless mala fides or other substantive defects are shown. Where the books were later produced and no reasoned basis was recorded for disbelieving them, adverse inference could not be drawn merely from the survey circumstances. The rejection of the books was therefore unsustainable, and the assessee was entitled to acceptance of the books and a de novo assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166366</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>