<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 1052 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166362</link>
    <description>Input tax credit under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act is available to a dealer moving from presumptive tax to regular tax only on strict compliance with the prescribed transition procedure. A dealer covered by presumptive tax is excluded from credit, and on changeover must file Form No. 25A, stock inventory and purchase bill statements within time; the assessing authority may allow credit only after verification. Mere later assessment at schedule rate after detection of suppressed turnover does not create an automatic right to credit. On the facts stated, the credit claim was rightly rejected for non-compliance with the statutory requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2014 16:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365496" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 1052 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166362</link>
      <description>Input tax credit under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act is available to a dealer moving from presumptive tax to regular tax only on strict compliance with the prescribed transition procedure. A dealer covered by presumptive tax is excluded from credit, and on changeover must file Form No. 25A, stock inventory and purchase bill statements within time; the assessing authority may allow credit only after verification. Mere later assessment at schedule rate after detection of suppressed turnover does not create an automatic right to credit. On the facts stated, the credit claim was rightly rejected for non-compliance with the statutory requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166362</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>