https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166357 The court dismissed the writ petition and vacated the interim order as the petitioner lacked a specific promise for promissory estoppel. The petitioner had no legal right to claim contract extension or interim relief after the contract period expired, as there was no official extension granted. The court emphasized that interim orders cannot extend contract periods, leading to the dismissal of the petition. en-us Wed, 06 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 19 Sep 2014 17:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166357 The court dismissed the writ petition and vacated the interim order as the petitioner lacked a specific promise for promissory estoppel. The petitioner had no legal right to claim contract extension or interim relief after the contract period expired, as there was no official extension granted. The court emphasized that interim orders cannot extend contract periods, leading to the dismissal of the petition. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 06 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166357