<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 620 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251594</link>
    <description>The court held that the re-opening of assessments based on a declaration by a Division Bench regarding the sale of Duty Entitlement Pass Book (DEPB) entitlements at concessional rates using &#039;C&#039; Forms in inter-State sales was unwarranted. The Division Bench&#039;s observation on &#039;C&#039; Forms in the DEPB Scheme did not constitute a definitive ruling, and the re-opening notices lacked specificity. It was clarified that DEPB transactions involve the sale of goods, allowing inter-State sales using &#039;C&#039; Forms. The re-opening of assessments and related orders were deemed illegal, and the writ petitions were allowed, with parties bearing their respective costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2014 08:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365467" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 620 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251594</link>
      <description>The court held that the re-opening of assessments based on a declaration by a Division Bench regarding the sale of Duty Entitlement Pass Book (DEPB) entitlements at concessional rates using &#039;C&#039; Forms in inter-State sales was unwarranted. The Division Bench&#039;s observation on &#039;C&#039; Forms in the DEPB Scheme did not constitute a definitive ruling, and the re-opening notices lacked specificity. It was clarified that DEPB transactions involve the sale of goods, allowing inter-State sales using &#039;C&#039; Forms. The re-opening of assessments and related orders were deemed illegal, and the writ petitions were allowed, with parties bearing their respective costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251594</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>