<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 614 - Madras High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251588</link>
    <description>The court ruled against the assessee, a manufacturer of Cotton Yarn, in a dispute over the assessment basis for duty refund. The Assessing Officer&#039;s decision to reject the refund claim was upheld, emphasizing that the declared factory price, not the subsequent depot price, should be final for assessment. The court emphasized the importance of determining both factory and depot prices and choosing the lower one for assessment, aligning with previous precedents. By overturning CESTAT&#039;s decision, the court confirmed the original assessment order, denying the refund claim and stressing the need for accuracy and consistency in duty refund assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2014 08:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365461" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 614 - Madras High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251588</link>
      <description>The court ruled against the assessee, a manufacturer of Cotton Yarn, in a dispute over the assessment basis for duty refund. The Assessing Officer&#039;s decision to reject the refund claim was upheld, emphasizing that the declared factory price, not the subsequent depot price, should be final for assessment. The court emphasized the importance of determining both factory and depot prices and choosing the lower one for assessment, aligning with previous precedents. By overturning CESTAT&#039;s decision, the court confirmed the original assessment order, denying the refund claim and stressing the need for accuracy and consistency in duty refund assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251588</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>