<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 609 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251583</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, setting aside the assessment order due to an invalid notice under section 158BC, emphasizing the importance of complying with the stipulated time frame. As the assessment was invalidated on jurisdictional grounds, the Tribunal did not address the merits of the additions made in the block assessment. The request for a refund of taxes paid if the assessment was held invalid was rejected, in line with the principle that admitted tax should not be refunded in such circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2014 08:17:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365456" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 609 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251583</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, setting aside the assessment order due to an invalid notice under section 158BC, emphasizing the importance of complying with the stipulated time frame. As the assessment was invalidated on jurisdictional grounds, the Tribunal did not address the merits of the additions made in the block assessment. The request for a refund of taxes paid if the assessment was held invalid was rejected, in line with the principle that admitted tax should not be refunded in such circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251583</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>