<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 606 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251580</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and directed the Assessing Officer to cancel the penalty under Section 271D for a Cooperative Credit Society exceeding cash deposit limits. The decision was based on the society&#039;s belief in exemption under Section 269SS, subsequent compliance, and precedents supporting penalty waivers for similar cases. The Tribunal emphasized the society&#039;s bonafide belief and adherence to legal requirements post-informing, aligning with previous judgments and a CBDT circular against indiscriminate penalties on such societies. The appeal was allowed, and the penalty was canceled, rendering the Stay Application moot.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2016 16:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365453" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 606 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251580</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and directed the Assessing Officer to cancel the penalty under Section 271D for a Cooperative Credit Society exceeding cash deposit limits. The decision was based on the society&#039;s belief in exemption under Section 269SS, subsequent compliance, and precedents supporting penalty waivers for similar cases. The Tribunal emphasized the society&#039;s bonafide belief and adherence to legal requirements post-informing, aligning with previous judgments and a CBDT circular against indiscriminate penalties on such societies. The appeal was allowed, and the penalty was canceled, rendering the Stay Application moot.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251580</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>