<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 603 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251577</link>
    <description>On a first return filed after search, the assessee had to substantiate opening assets, liabilities, investments, loans and advances, and the unexplained opening-assets addition was set aside for fresh adjudication. Household withdrawals were allowed to be estimated on the facts, with the low-expense additions largely sustained and only limited reduction where the estimate was excessive. Receipts described as salary were not proved by employer records or supporting evidence and were therefore taxed under the residual head as income from other sources. For assessment year 2009-10, a consolidated ad hoc income estimate was not sustained in full; the Tribunal retained interest income, rejected the unsupported Chapter VI-A claim, and reduced the assessed income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2014 08:17:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365450" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 603 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251577</link>
      <description>On a first return filed after search, the assessee had to substantiate opening assets, liabilities, investments, loans and advances, and the unexplained opening-assets addition was set aside for fresh adjudication. Household withdrawals were allowed to be estimated on the facts, with the low-expense additions largely sustained and only limited reduction where the estimate was excessive. Receipts described as salary were not proved by employer records or supporting evidence and were therefore taxed under the residual head as income from other sources. For assessment year 2009-10, a consolidated ad hoc income estimate was not sustained in full; the Tribunal retained interest income, rejected the unsupported Chapter VI-A claim, and reduced the assessed income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251577</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>