<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 601 - ITAT  DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251575</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal on all grounds, concluding that the royalty payments were at arm&#039;s length, the royalty and technical guidance fees were revenue expenditures, and the export commission was not subject to disallowance under Section 40(a)(i). The appeal of the assessee was thus allowed in full.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2015 17:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365448" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 601 - ITAT  DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251575</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal on all grounds, concluding that the royalty payments were at arm&#039;s length, the royalty and technical guidance fees were revenue expenditures, and the export commission was not subject to disallowance under Section 40(a)(i). The appeal of the assessee was thus allowed in full.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251575</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>