<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 707 - Madras High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166356</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions challenging the revised tax assessment but allowed the petitioner to appeal without depositing 25 percent of the amount. The court also quashed the penalty orders imposed without a personal hearing, remanding the matter for fresh orders after ensuring a personal hearing for the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2014 17:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365429" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 707 - Madras High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166356</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions challenging the revised tax assessment but allowed the petitioner to appeal without depositing 25 percent of the amount. The court also quashed the penalty orders imposed without a personal hearing, remanding the matter for fresh orders after ensuring a personal hearing for the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166356</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>