<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 599 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251573</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by a private limited company against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal due to a delay of 2 years, 6 months, and 27 days in filing the appeal before the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals). The Court found that there was no application for condonation of delay included in the appeal papers, raising doubts on the validity of the appeal. As a result, the Court rejected the appeal at the admission stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2014 10:57:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365414" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 599 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251573</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by a private limited company against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal due to a delay of 2 years, 6 months, and 27 days in filing the appeal before the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals). The Court found that there was no application for condonation of delay included in the appeal papers, raising doubts on the validity of the appeal. As a result, the Court rejected the appeal at the admission stage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251573</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>