https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251566 Tax demand under writ challenge was treated as partly infructuous for amounts already stated to be payable, while the remaining entries were left to the statutory revision process because refund and input tax credit claims required adjudication and adjustment through that route. The Court did not quash the demand in full; it directed payment of the relevant amounts subject to any reserved rights where applicable. It also directed the revisional authorities to consider properly filed stay petitions and decide them on merits within thirty days, with the direction unavailable if the revisions were defective. The writ petition was disposed of with partial relief and limited procedural directions. en-us Mon, 21 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Sep 2014 10:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251566 Tax demand under writ challenge was treated as partly infructuous for amounts already stated to be payable, while the remaining entries were left to the statutory revision process because refund and input tax credit claims required adjudication and adjustment through that route. The Court did not quash the demand in full; it directed payment of the relevant amounts subject to any reserved rights where applicable. It also directed the revisional authorities to consider properly filed stay petitions and decide them on merits within thirty days, with the direction unavailable if the revisions were defective. The writ petition was disposed of with partial relief and limited procedural directions. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 21 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251566