<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 591 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251565</link>
    <description>The Court partially allowed the writ petition, setting aside the impugned order and remanding the matter to the respondent for fresh adjudication. The petitioner was granted the opportunity to submit another representation within a specified period, with directions for the respondent to consider all submissions and pass orders in accordance with the law. The Court aimed to rectify procedural lapses and ensure a fair and lawful resolution of the tax dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2014 10:50:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365405" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 591 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251565</link>
      <description>The Court partially allowed the writ petition, setting aside the impugned order and remanding the matter to the respondent for fresh adjudication. The petitioner was granted the opportunity to submit another representation within a specified period, with directions for the respondent to consider all submissions and pass orders in accordance with the law. The Court aimed to rectify procedural lapses and ensure a fair and lawful resolution of the tax dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251565</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>