https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251559 The Supreme Court allowed the appeals in part, setting aside the High Court's judgment and orders. The appellant was directed to prefer statutory appeals with the condition of depositing Rs. 2.5 crores. The appeals were to be disposed of within three months, and the Court clarified that it had not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. The Court also addressed the status of bank guarantees furnished by other appellants, providing specific directions based on whether the guarantees had been encashed. en-us Thu, 04 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Jul 2023 17:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251559 The Supreme Court allowed the appeals in part, setting aside the High Court's judgment and orders. The appellant was directed to prefer statutory appeals with the condition of depositing Rs. 2.5 crores. The appeals were to be disposed of within three months, and the Court clarified that it had not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. The Court also addressed the status of bank guarantees furnished by other appellants, providing specific directions based on whether the guarantees had been encashed. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 04 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251559