<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 579 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251553</link>
    <description>Customs duty proceedings were challenged on the ground that the show cause notice was issued before expiry of the export obligation period under the licence. The analysis treats that premature initiation as arbitrary and technically faulty, particularly where the licence allowed eight years for compliance and the original order was passed without a reply from the exporter. It emphasises that the real inquiry is whether the exporter ultimately satisfied the licence conditions, and that substantial justice should prevail over a mere technical default. On that reasoning, the impugned customs demand and connected appellate orders were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2015 11:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365393" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 579 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251553</link>
      <description>Customs duty proceedings were challenged on the ground that the show cause notice was issued before expiry of the export obligation period under the licence. The analysis treats that premature initiation as arbitrary and technically faulty, particularly where the licence allowed eight years for compliance and the original order was passed without a reply from the exporter. It emphasises that the real inquiry is whether the exporter ultimately satisfied the licence conditions, and that substantial justice should prevail over a mere technical default. On that reasoning, the impugned customs demand and connected appellate orders were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251553</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>