<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 566 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251540</link>
    <description>The court upheld the decision that handheld electronic ticketing machines do not fall under H.S.N. Code 8471 for a 4% tax rate, affirming the 12.5% tax assessment. The judgment emphasized classification based on commercial understanding and marketability, dismissing revision petitions and supporting the prevailing tax treatment under the Central Excise Tariff Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 16:20:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365366" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 566 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251540</link>
      <description>The court upheld the decision that handheld electronic ticketing machines do not fall under H.S.N. Code 8471 for a 4% tax rate, affirming the 12.5% tax assessment. The judgment emphasized classification based on commercial understanding and marketability, dismissing revision petitions and supporting the prevailing tax treatment under the Central Excise Tariff Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251540</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>