<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 561 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251535</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, upholding AAIFR&#039;s decision to condone the delay in filing the appeal. It emphasized the violation of natural justice principles in the BIFR proceedings and directed the parties to appear before AAIFR for further proceedings, ensuring consideration of the respondent&#039;s contentions in accordance with relevant guidelines and policies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2015 15:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365358" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 561 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251535</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, upholding AAIFR&#039;s decision to condone the delay in filing the appeal. It emphasized the violation of natural justice principles in the BIFR proceedings and directed the parties to appear before AAIFR for further proceedings, ensuring consideration of the respondent&#039;s contentions in accordance with relevant guidelines and policies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251535</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>