<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 561 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251535</link>
    <description>An appeal under Section 25 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 had to be filed within 45 days from communication of the order to the aggrieved person, and Regulation 15 required service of a certified copy in the prescribed manner. Because the respondent was not a party before BIFR, a photocopy of the proceedings was not a statutory communication and the limitation period ran from receipt of the certified copy. The Court also noted that sanctioning waiver of interest and penalty without notice to the revenue raised natural justice concerns, and sustained the AAIFR&#039;s view on limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2015 15:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365358" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 561 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251535</link>
      <description>An appeal under Section 25 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 had to be filed within 45 days from communication of the order to the aggrieved person, and Regulation 15 required service of a certified copy in the prescribed manner. Because the respondent was not a party before BIFR, a photocopy of the proceedings was not a statutory communication and the limitation period ran from receipt of the certified copy. The Court also noted that sanctioning waiver of interest and penalty without notice to the revenue raised natural justice concerns, and sustained the AAIFR&#039;s view on limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251535</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>