<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 548 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251522</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that they were not liable to deduct tax under Section 194-I for the amount paid as hiring charges on plant and machinery. The court found that the agreement specifically pertained to machinery use and excluded payment for land and building. Therefore, the assessee&#039;s obligation to deduct tax did not extend to the amount paid for plant and machinery only. As a result, the appeal filed by the Department was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 15:36:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=365345" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 548 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251522</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that they were not liable to deduct tax under Section 194-I for the amount paid as hiring charges on plant and machinery. The court found that the agreement specifically pertained to machinery use and excluded payment for land and building. Therefore, the assessee&#039;s obligation to deduct tax did not extend to the amount paid for plant and machinery only. As a result, the appeal filed by the Department was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=251522</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>